site stats

Stratford v investec bank case summary

Web4 Mar 2011 · Zurich Bank v. McConnon. Facts The plaintiff herein sought summary judgment in the sum of €31,883,565.56 together with continuing interest against the defendant. The plaintiff claimed that by way of Facility Letter it offered to advance to the defendant the sum of €32,522,613 subject to the terms and conditions set out in that … WebThe Constitutional Court ruled in Stratford v Investec Bank Ltd 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC)2 that, under section 9(4A) 3, domestic employees must also be notified of the provisional or final winding up of their employer's estate, which would further secure their rights in labour law if such circumstances resulted in their dismissal due to operational ...

Investec Bank Limited v Stratford and Another (10394/2012) [2013 …

WebIt is clear from the provisions of s 65F (3) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 32 of 1944 that a judgment debtor who can show that he is bona fide unable to pay a debt, which he has been ordered to pay in terms of s 65A of the Act, through lack of means is immune from imprisonment for contempt of court. http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2024/615.rtf graham\u0027s number how many zeros https://fantaskis.com

(PDF) Howard Chitimira "The Meaning of Advantage to Creditors …

Web7 Jan 2015 · Mr and Ms Stratford are indebted to Investec Bank Limited (Investec) for over R240 million. After Investec was granted a provisional sequestration order in respect of … Web25 Dec 2015 · Stratford v Investec 2015 (3) SA 1 (cc) Tshegofatso Kgarabjang; Tshegofatso Kgarabjang. Search for more papers by this author . ... The Supreme Court of Appeal in Gungudoo v Hannover Reinsurance Group Africa (Pty) Ltd 2012 (6) SA 537 (SCA) para 41 held that the word ‘employees’ as indicated in s 9(4A)(a)(ii)(aa) refers to employees of the ... Web2 Sep 2014 · The Court noted that section 39 (2) of the Constitution requires courts in interpreting legislation to promote the spirit, purport and objects of the Constitution. The … china italy chamber of commerce luxottica

Stratford and Others v Investec Bank Limited and Others

Category:Southern African Legal Information Institute

Tags:Stratford v investec bank case summary

Stratford v investec bank case summary

Epstein v Epstein - nota - EPSTEIN v EPSTEIN 1987 4 SA.

Web14 Aug 2013 · King Williams Town -and its valuation is three hundred and eighty thousand rand (“R380 000.00 ”) and four hundred thousand rand (aR400 000.00”) from the Stratford’s Trust Respondents had interests in many companies which he claims they are either dormant or liquidated. Web14 Aug 2013 · The Court also limited the retrospective effect of its interpretation of section 9 (4A). The appeal was dismissed. Judgment Leeuw AJ (unanimous). Application for leave …

Stratford v investec bank case summary

Did you know?

Web19 Dec 2014 · Mr and Ms Stratford are indebted to Investec Bank Limited (Investec) for over R240 million. After Investec was granted a provisional sequestration order in respect of … WebINVESTEC BANK LIMITED First Respondent MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT Second Respondent MINISTER OF LABOUR Third Respondent Neutral …

WebThe facts in Stratford v Investec Bank Ltd 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC) were that on 15 October 2012 the Western Cape High Court, on petition of Investec Bank (the bank), granted an order … WebCASE N0. 29586/2024 (1) REPORTABLE: YES/ NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO ... as her primary residence. In summary, Abdoola’s direct and substantial interest in the matter is alleged to be arising from the above facts. ... In Stratford And Others V Investec Bank Ltd And Others 2015 (3) SA 1 ...

WebAs our past has revealed, law is used both to legitimize power and constrain it. The doctrine of the rule of law provides the mechanisms for which one tries to strike a balance …

Web14 Apr 2024 · APPELLANT. and. MOHAMMED SHAAZ MOOSA. RESPONDENT. Neutral Citation: Liberty Group Limited v Moosa (126/2024) [2024] ZASCA 52 (14 April 2024) Coram: PONNAN ADP and MBATHA, MOTHLE, MEYER and MOLEFE JJA. Heard: 17 March 2024. Delivered: 14 April 2024. Summary: Appealability – Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 – whether …

WebCASE NO: 2024/38729. REPORTABLE: NO / YES OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO / YES REVISED. 11/2/2024 . ... Stratford & Others v Investec Bank Ltd and Others : 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC) stated that specifying the cents in the rand or a 'not negligible' benefit to creditors is unhelpful. The court made it clear that the meaning of the term china-italy innovation weekWeb19 Dec 2014 · [6] Investec entered into various agreements with Mr Stratford, in terms of which he bound himself as surety and co-principal debtor, jointly and severally, with various entities in the Pinnacle Point Group. Almost all these entities are either in liquidation or … The Insolvency Act, 1916 (Act 32 of 1916), the Insolvency Act, 1916, Amendment … INVESTEC BANK LIMITED First Respondent MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND … We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. chinaitechghanaWebHarksen v Lane case; MRL3701 CASE Summary - CASES SUMMARIES FOR INSOLVENCY LAW; Insolvency+Law+311+Module+outline+2024; EX Parte Harmse 2005 (1) SA 323 (N) ... In the case of Stratford v Investec Bank Ltd 2015 when defining the advantage to the creditors the meaning should be broad they do not focus on the amount of money being … china item crosswordhttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2014/38.html china italy belt and roadhttp://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2024/447.pdf graham\u0027s nursery wilmer alWebRolfe v Investec Bank 2014 o Rolfe v Investec Bank (Australia) Ltd o Lease regarding shipping containment business. Rolfe had a license to leave the containers on the premises. Rofle’s investment had given him permission to keep the containments on the premises until he found a suitable way to get them removed. There was no bailment. graham\\u0027s north sioux cityWebIN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Prinsloo v Van der Linde and another Case CCT 4/96 Decided on 18 April 1997 Media Summary The following media summary is provided to assist in reporting this case and is not binding on the Constitutional Court or any member of the Court. The case involved a challenge to the constitutionality of s 84 of the … graham\u0027s number written out